Navalyze · Container · Ship

TAMPA TRIUMPH

IMO: 9737462
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 79,750 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. · part of Shoei

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 111,476 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

299

Container median 186 kg/nm (+61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.38

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−53%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

109.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,917 t

CO₂ emitted

52,841 t

Distance sailed

56,565 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,718 h

155 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 254 kg/nm · median 177 (+44%)

78.8Ranks 1,694 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.96 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−39%)

7.22Ranks 567 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU36%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,094 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TAMPA TRIUMPH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TAMPA TRIUMPH
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TAMPA TRIUMPH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	−77%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+12%	+18%	+264%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−22%	−25%	−25%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	−53%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+5%	−4%	+26%	−0%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−9%	−5%	−22%	−4%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+4%	−5%	+34%	+1%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	4,204	13,124	16,523	1,072	15.4	254	9.96	–
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	19,407	60,532	72,271	4,633	15.6	269	–	–
2023	not published	4,738	14,867	19,829	1,333	14.9	239	10.9	–
2022	not published	8,176	25,555	26,539	1,737	15.3	308	10.7	–
2021	not published	16,917	52,841	56,565	3,718	15.2	299	8.38	–
2020	not published	12,767	39,835	44,951	2,699	16.7	284	8.41	–
2019	not published	17,955	55,983	57,786	3,594	16.1	311	8.75	–
2018	not published	12,899	40,237	43,209	2,461	17.6	299	8.67	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	9.96	16.3	−39%	567 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	10.9	19.4	−44%	450 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	10.7	19.1	−44%	369 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	8.38	17.9	−53%	199 of 1,781	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	8.41	17.6	−52%	255 of 1,797	ClassNK	A+B+C
2019	not published	8.75	18.9	−54%	245 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B+C
2018	not published	8.67	20.2	−57%	176 of 1,705	ClassNK	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.