Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 16 |
| CO₂ emitted | 585 kt−20.2% |
| Fuel per mile | 273 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.7.8 (−52% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. | 10 | 7.8 | −52% | 304 | 14.1 | 4,142 | 2.6% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.47.1 (−15% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. | 3 | 47.1 | −15% | 102 | 14.3 | 1,835 | 3.1% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.6.5 (−17% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. | 3 | 6.5 | −17% | 72 | 10.5 | 744 | 2.7% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. | ClassNK (16) | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% |
SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOBAL FANFARE | 9969027 | Bulk carrier | 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +41% | 8.2 | 401 t | €11k |
| EVER GENTLE | 9820922 | Container | 9.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +30% | 15.1 | 78,888 t | €2.3m |
| EVER GENIUS | 9786815 | Container | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +21% | 16.6 | 78,970 t | €2.2m |
| EVER GOVERN | 9832717 | Container | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +21% | 14.6 | 65,489 t | €1.8m |
| EVER GLORY | 9786839 | Container | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +14% | 15.5 | 76,316 t | €2.1m |
| MERCURY ACE | 9591052 | Vehicle carrier | 47.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | +8% | 14.5 | 6,730 t | €204k |
| EVER GOLDEN | 9811012 | Container | 7.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +6% | 15.1 | 84,479 t | €2.4m |
| IGUAZU HIGHWAY | 9827243 | Vehicle carrier | 36.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +3% | 14.4 | 12,544 t | €360k |
| ONE TRUTH | 9773210 | Container | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +1% | 11.8 | 39,192 t | €1.2m |
| FEDERAL IMABARI | 9774331 | Bulk carrier | 4.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −3% | 10.0 | 2,209 t | €59k |
| TAMPA TRIUMPH | 9737462 | Container | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | −3% | 15.4 | 13,124 t | €363k |
| METIS LEADER | 9650743 | Vehicle carrier | 66.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | −13% | 14.0 | 5,722 t | €141k |
| ONE INTEGRITY | 9933119 | Container | 6.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −13% | 12.2 | 40,204 t | €1.1m |
| ONE INNOVATION | 9939137 | Container | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −16% | 12.3 | 35,975 t | €1.0m |
| THEODORE VENIAMIS | 1036032 | Bulk carrier | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −18% | 11.4 | 2,622 t | €70k |
| ONE INGENUITY | 9933016 | Container | 5.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −21% | 12.7 | 42,053 t | €1.3m |
30 of 16 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.