Navalyze · Container · Ship

TOKYO TRIUMPH

IMO: 9737474
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 107,104 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.50 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 108,485 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

244

Container median 182 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.05

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−65%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

93.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,452 t

CO₂ emitted

42,096 t

Distance sailed

55,041 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,458 h

144 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,781 container ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 334 kg/nm · median 186 (+80%)

80.1Ranks 1,640 of 1,781, lowest first325

Average speedThis ship 20.3 kn · median 14.1 (+44%)

10.7Faster than 99% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.9 (−45%)

7.81Ranks 308 of 1,781, lowest first50.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU37%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,709 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TOKYO TRIUMPH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

TOKYO TRIUMPH
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TOKYO TRIUMPH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+5%	+8%	−19%	+13%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+20%	+23%	+2%	+11%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.4 kn	+9%	+32%	+25%	+11%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2021	not published	18,956	59,820	56,703	2,787	20.3	334	9.85	–
2020	not published	22,497	70,315	70,393	3,574	19.7	320	8.69	–
2019	not published	18,329	57,263	68,911	3,572	19.3	266	7.81	–
2018	not published	13,452	42,096	55,041	3,458	15.9	244	7.05	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021	not published	9.85	17.9	−45%	308 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	8.69	17.6	−51%	279 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	7.81	18.9	−59%	175 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	7.05	20.2	−65%	61 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.