Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SAANA

IMO: 9739836
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,004 t
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Helsinki
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.73 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: FURE VALO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: OSM Ship management Finland Oy · part of OSM Thome

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,801 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

55.1

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (−34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+10%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,535 t

CO₂ emitted

10,341 t

Distance sailed

64,105 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,167 h

257 days, 70% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 49.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−38%)

52.8Ranks 98 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 11.1 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 25% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+36%)

7.93Ranks 959 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

892 t

8.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAANA
Chemical tanker median

40.050.060.070.080.090.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAANA
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAANA
Chemical tanker median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	+5%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−7%	−12%	−15%	+7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−5%	−3%	−15%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+8%	+9%	−3%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+9%	+12%	+28%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	−5%	+40%	+31%	+8%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	OSM Ship management Finland Oy	2,329	6,741	47,223	4,680	10.1	49.3	20.4	–
2024	OSM Ship management Finland Oy	2,376	7,070	44,930	4,456	10.1	52.9	23.0	–
2023	not published	3,020	9,072	53,119	5,015	10.6	56.9	21.4	–
2022	not published	3,715	11,241	62,369	5,953	10.5	59.6	22.1	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	3,535	10,341	64,105	6,167	10.4	55.1	18.3	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,528	7,222	50,128	4,929	10.2	50.4	18.1	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,021	5,779	38,273	5,523	6.9	52.8	16.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	OSM Ship management Finland Oy	20.4	15.0	+36%	959 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	OSM Ship management Finland Oy	23.0	16.7	+37%	852 of 1,274	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	21.4	16.2	+32%	845 of 1,314	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	22.1	16.1	+37%	969 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	18.3	16.7	+10%	774 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	18.1	16.2	+12%	771 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	16.8	17.3	−3%	627 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.