Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- OSM Thomeyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| OSM Thome | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 89 |
| CO₂ emitted | 508 kt+15.2% |
| Fuel per mile | 86 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 8.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- OSM Thome9.7 (−35% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | 38 | 9.7 | −35% | 82 | 10.7 | 2,234 | 10.0% | 2 |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- OSM Thome9.2 (+15% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | 16 | 9.2 | +15% | 105 | 10.7 | 2,265 | 9.3% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- OSM Thome7.0 (−12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | 14 | 7.0 | −12% | 83 | 11.1 | 2,124 | 3.2% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Offshore
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 1,367
- OSM Thome516 (−62% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | 14 | 516 | −62% | 81 | 5.8 | 1,458 | 9.9% | – |
| Segment median | 1,367 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- OSM Thome236 (+326% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | 3 | 236 | +326% | 59 | 11.9 | 3,567 | 3.9% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- OSM Thome121 (+27% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | 1 | 121 | +27% | 106 | 12.3 | 4,114 | 6.6% | – |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- OSM Thome65.5 (+821% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | 1 | 65.5 | +821% | 89 | 10.4 | 2,723 | 13.1% | – |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Thome | DNV (82), China Classification Society (7) | 3% | 99% | 84% | 0% |
OSM Thome: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANSCENDEN EMERALD | 9948839 | Bulk carrier | 195 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +1159% | 11.4 | 4,817 t | €129k |
| TITAN VISION | 9468449 | LNG carrier | 65.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +821% | 10.4 | 7,953 t | €346k |
| HAFNIA LISE | 9726621 | Oil tanker | 57.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +111% | 4.2 | 242 t | €8k |
| POLARIS PRINCESS | 9136967 | Vehicle carrier | 255 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +61% | 11.8 | 8,861 t | €320k |
| POLARIS LIBERTY | 9407689 | Vehicle carrier | 236 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +49% | 12.0 | 14,517 t | €698k |
| HAFNIA SOYA | 9729271 | Chemical tanker | 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +48% | 8.5 | 11,638 t | €429k |
| ANJI FLOURISHMENT | 1038602 | Vehicle carrier | 107 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | +41% | 12.0 | 593 t | €24k |
| JAARLI | 9892432 | Oil tanker | 10.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +23% | 8.5 | 25,977 t | €1.3m |
| ASTURIAS | 9481049 | Ro-ro | 121 g CO₂/t·nm | 100 | +21% | 12.3 | 16,631 t | €522k |
| MURMURE | 9939618 | Chemical tanker | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +20% | 11.8 | 2,335 t | €88k |
| HAFNIA MALACCA | 9725627 | Chemical tanker | 25.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +19% | 7.4 | 10,283 t | €431k |
| BOW CAROLINE | 9367554 | Chemical tanker | 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | +15% | 11.6 | 7,879 t | €278k |
| HAFNIA BERING | 9725603 | Chemical tanker | 17.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +14% | 8.9 | 10,412 t | €347k |
| HAFNIA TANZANITE | 9753703 | Chemical tanker | 9.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +14% | 11.7 | 8,547 t | €240k |
| JATULI | 9892444 | Oil tanker | 9.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +14% | 10.1 | 24,839 t | €1.2m |
| SHANDONG FU YUAN | 9734769 | Bulk carrier | 17.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +14% | 8.9 | 2,560 t | €70k |
| BOW HARMONY | 9379909 | Chemical tanker | 13.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | +13% | 12.5 | 9,051 t | €314k |
| SHANDONG FU YOU | 9734745 | Bulk carrier | 7.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +11% | 10.7 | 5,420 t | €148k |
| HM FLIPPER | 9263631 | Offshore | 516 g CO₂/t·nm | 467 | +11% | 5.8 | 2,227 t | €0 |
| HAFNIA TORRES | 9729283 | Chemical tanker | 16.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +10% | 9.0 | 13,324 t | €538k |
| HAFNIA TURQUOISE | 9753674 | Chemical tanker | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +9% | 11.5 | 7,800 t | €228k |
| BTG BALFOUR | 9952452 | Bulk carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +7% | 11.2 | 14,265 t | €332k |
| BTG LOGAN | 9952517 | Bulk carrier | 7.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +6% | 10.7 | 2,834 t | €0 |
| HAFNIA MAGELLAN | 9725615 | Chemical tanker | 16.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +5% | 9.1 | 10,119 t | €449k |
| REDAMANCY | 9939620 | Chemical tanker | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +5% | 12.3 | 4,316 t | €117k |
| HAFNIA AZURITE | 9727560 | Chemical tanker | 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +2% | 12.7 | 2,700 t | €79k |
| HAFNIA TOURMALINE | 9753698 | Chemical tanker | 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | −4% | 11.2 | 4,379 t | €130k |
| HAFNIA KIRSTEN | 9732682 | Chemical tanker | 7.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −4% | 12.1 | 1,455 t | €43k |
| CHEM GUARD | 9261762 | Oil tanker | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | −5% | 10.3 | 1,536 t | €43k |
| BTG FUJI | 9731846 | Bulk carrier | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −8% | 11.1 | 4,446 t | €117k |
30 of 91 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.