Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE EAGLE

IMO: 9741396
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 71,036 t
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NYK EAGLE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 71,036 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

202.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.87

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−46%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

71.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,366 t

CO₂ emitted

7,373 t

7,489 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,702 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

794 h

33 days, 9% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 202.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+14%)

78.8Ranks 1,289 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 73% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.87 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−46%)

7.22Ranks 448 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU98%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,772 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ONE EAGLE
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE EAGLE
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE EAGLE
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+9.5 kn	−1%	+179%	+376%	–	9.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−6.4 kn	−5%	−57%	−84%	–	6.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	−2%	−18%	−23%	+1%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−3%	−9%	−38%	−7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−5%	−8%	−47%	−14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	−4%	−13%	−30%	−4%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,366	7,373	11,702	794	14.7	202.2	8.87	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	502	1,568	2,457	470	5.2	204.1	–	–
2022	not published	3,296	10,440	15,361	1,322	11.6	214.5	5.94	–
2021	not published	4,391	13,879	20,024	1,452	13.8	219.3	5.90	–
2020	not published	7,256	22,910	32,236	2,186	14.7	225.1	6.34	–
2019	not published	14,272	44,490	60,432	3,952	15.3	236.2	7.34	–
2018	not published	21,341	66,476	86,479	5,116	16.9	246.8	7.68	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	8.87	16.30	−46%	448 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	5.94	19.13	−69%	31 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	5.90	17.90	−67%	46 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	6.34	17.58	−64%	115 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	7.34	18.88	−61%	147 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	7.68	20.22	−62%	113 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.