Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ROMANE

IMO: 9745653
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 73,083 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 52,753 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

256

Container median 165 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−22%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,188 t

CO₂ emitted

44,367 t

Distance sailed

55,440 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,588 h

150 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 298 kg/nm · median 177 (+68%)

78.8Ranks 1,967 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 13.3 (+19%)

9.1Faster than 87% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−22%)

7.22Ranks 837 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU36%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,384 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ROMANE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ROMANE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ROMANE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	−3%	+10%	−53%	−2%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	+20%	+8%	−7%	−15%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−19%	−20%	−19%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+6%	+1%	+41%	+9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	−6%	−19%	+81%	−8%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+8%	+16%	−62%	−9%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.3 kn	+4%	+20%	−9%	−1%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7,243	22,566	24,313	1,540	15.8	298	12.7	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	15,886	49,559	51,712	3,726	13.9	307	12.9	–
2023	not published	14,188	44,367	55,440	3,588	15.5	256	15.2	–
2022	not published	21,735	67,712	68,617	4,372	15.7	317	13.5	–
2021	not published	14,533	45,295	48,703	2,962	16.4	298	12.4	–
2020	not published	8,525	26,799	26,855	1,413	19.0	317	13.5	–
2019	not published	20,964	65,405	71,068	4,017	17.7	295	14.8	–
2018	not published	22,127	69,099	78,278	5,089	15.4	283	15.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.7	16.3	−22%	837 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.9	17.5	−26%	679 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.2	19.4	−22%	737 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	13.5	19.1	−29%	599 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	12.4	17.9	−31%	495 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.5	17.6	−23%	616 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	14.8	18.9	−22%	644 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	15.0	20.2	−26%	542 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.