Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS STELLA

IMO: 9749570
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,920 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,244 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

131

Vehicle carrier median 108 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

49.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 57.7 (−14%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,312 t

CO₂ emitted

4,100 t

Distance sailed

10,004 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

747 h

31 days, 9% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 121 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+21%)

79.6Ranks 465 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 14.4 (+0%)

12.0Faster than 51% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 63.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+15%)

34.7Ranks 299 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU52%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

114 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOVIS STELLA
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS STELLA
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS STELLA
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−0%	−9%	+142%	+53%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−5%	+3%	+449%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−3%	+5%	−50%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+8%	+0%	+170%	−44%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.1 kn	−3%	+23%	−26%	+71%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.4 kn	+9%	−10%	−89%	−7%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.4 kn	+4%	+25%	+25%	+11%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	7,968	24,873	65,913	4,563	14.4	121	63.8	–
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	3,302	10,295	27,183	1,727	15.7	122	41.6	–
2023	not published	631	1,984	4,955	341	14.5	127	–	–
2022	not published	1,312	4,100	10,004	747	13.4	131	49.7	–
2021	not published	451	1,410	3,709	256	14.5	122	88.5	–
2020	not published	632	1,973	5,014	441	11.4	126	51.8	–
2019	not published	5,501	17,161	47,664	3,466	13.8	115	55.4	–
2018	not published	4,252	13,274	38,172	3,334	11.4	111	49.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	63.8	55.4	+15%	299 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	41.6	55.3	−25%	63 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	49.7	57.7	−14%	161 of 463	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	88.5	59.6	+49%	366 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	51.8	57.3	−10%	166 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	55.4	59.0	−6%	181 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	49.8	62.4	−20%	79 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.