Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS SIRIUS

IMO: 9749582
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 9,001 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

123

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

15.3 kn

Fuel per day at sea

45.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,660 t

CO₂ emitted

5,198 t

Distance sailed

13,488 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

884 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 120 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+20%)

79.6Ranks 460 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 14.4 (+8%)

12.0Faster than 81% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 41.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−25%)

34.7Ranks 111 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU42%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

219 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOVIS SIRIUS
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS SIRIUS
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS SIRIUS
Vehicle carrier median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−4%	−6%	−51%	−25%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+1%	+6%	+69%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+3%	−0%	+13%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+12%	+15%	−55%	+37%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−4%	+5%	−5%	−8%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−11%	−1%	+12%	−27%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+1%	−11%	+203%	+5%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	1,356	4,229	11,304	728	15.5	120	41.6	–
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	2,852	8,926	22,858	1,432	16.0	125	55.4	–
2023	not published	1,660	5,198	13,488	884	15.3	123	–	–
2022	not published	1,424	4,472	11,914	754	15.8	120	52.4	–
2021	not published	2,830	8,854	26,530	1,724	15.4	107	38.2	–
2020	not published	3,075	9,691	27,794	1,956	14.2	111	41.6	–
2019	not published	3,107	9,698	24,878	1,962	12.7	125	57.4	–
2018	not published	1,017	3,167	8,212	570	14.4	124	54.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	41.6	55.4	−25%	111 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	55.4	55.3	+0%	170 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	52.4	57.7	−9%	183 of 463	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	38.2	59.6	−36%	32 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	41.6	57.3	−27%	59 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	57.4	59.0	−3%	204 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	54.7	62.4	−12%	127 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.