Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS SPRING

IMO: 9749594
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,771 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

132

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

13.3 kn

Fuel per day at sea

42.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,217 t

CO₂ emitted

3,806 t

Distance sailed

9,236 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

695 h

29 days, 8% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 113 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+13%)

79.6Ranks 420 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 76% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−30%)

34.7Ranks 82 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU42%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

274 t

7.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOVIS SPRING
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS SPRING
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS SPRING
Vehicle carrier median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−7%	−2%	+433%	−35%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−8%	+1%	−59%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	+6%	−5%	−59%	–	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+2%	−5%	−37%	+9%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.4 kn	+9%	+28%	+6%	−23%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+9%	+11%	+82%	−12%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	−11%	−0%	+32%	+6%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	2,257	6,810	20,007	1,305	15.3	113	38.8	–
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	455	1,429	3,756	258	14.5	121	60.2	–
2023	not published	1,217	3,806	9,236	695	13.3	132	–	–
2022	not published	2,788	8,737	22,428	1,521	14.7	124	44.5	–
2021	not published	4,345	13,578	35,598	2,244	15.9	122	40.9	–
2020	not published	3,763	11,887	33,482	2,486	13.5	112	53.0	–
2019	not published	1,904	5,941	18,423	1,396	13.2	103	60.1	–
2018	not published	1,628	5,084	13,952	1,190	11.7	117	56.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	38.8	55.4	−30%	82 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	60.2	55.3	+9%	190 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	44.5	57.7	−23%	93 of 463	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	40.9	59.6	−31%	47 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	53.0	57.3	−7%	193 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	60.1	59.0	+2%	223 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	56.9	62.4	−9%	158 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.