Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GREEN ZEEBRUGGE

IMO: 9750024
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Zeebrugge
Technical efficiency: EEXI 29.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: ENGIE ZEEBRUGGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd. · part of NYK

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

81.9 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

222

g CO₂/m³·nm

Average speed

8.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

17.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,457 t

CO₂ emitted

3,942 t

5,011 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,785 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,052 h

86 days, 23% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 219.4 kg/nm · median 230.7 (−5%)

166.5Ranks 156 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 7.2 kn · median 14.2 (−49%)

10.7Faster than 2% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 318.68 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+3,402%)

5.47Ranks 351 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU0%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU17%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,780 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

16.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

36.7 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.271

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GREEN ZEEBRUGGE
LNG carrier median

0.0200.0400.0600.0800.01,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GREEN ZEEBRUGGE
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−15%	−22%	−27%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	−56%	−42%	+173%	–	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 56%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+3.4 kn	−26%	+41%	+66%	–	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.6 kn	−65%	−82%	+160%	–	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 65%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	+333%	+249%	−82%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 333%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	−67%	−73%	+198%	–	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 67%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	1,457	3,942	17,785	2,052	8.7	81.9	–	–
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	2,356	6,398	24,332	2,585	9.4	96.8	–	–
2023LNG	not published	1,958	5,452	8,927	1,246	7.2	219.4	–	–
2022LNG	not published	1,594	4,506	5,384	1,428	3.8	296.1	–	–
2021LNG	not published	1,745	4,948	2,070	279	7.4	843.2	–	–
2020LNG	not published	2,275	6,400	11,686	1,270	9.2	194.7	–	–
2019LNG	not published	2,332	6,487	3,915	347	11.3	595.6	–	–
2018LNG	not published	1,672	4,651	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023LNG	not published	318.68	9.10	+3,402%	351 of 355	ClassNK	C
2022LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2021LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2020LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2019LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2018LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.