Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GREEN ZEEBRUGGE

IMO: 9750024
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Zeebrugge
Technical efficiency: EEXI 29.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: ENGIE ZEEBRUGGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd. · part of NYK

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

296

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

373

g CO₂/m³·nm

Average speed

3.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

26.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,594 t

CO₂ emitted

4,506 t

Distance sailed

5,384 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,428 h

60 days, 16% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 219 kg/nm · median 231 (−5%)

167Ranks 156 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 7.2 kn · median 14.2 (−49%)

10.7Faster than 2% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 319 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+3,402%)

5.47Ranks 351 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports54%
From the EU1%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU45%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,048 t

45.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GREEN ZEEBRUGGE
LNG carrier median

0.0200.0400.0600.0800.01,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GREEN ZEEBRUGGE
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−15%	−22%	−27%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	−56%	−42%	+173%	–	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 56%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+3.4 kn	−26%	+41%	+66%	–	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.6 kn	−65%	−82%	+160%	–	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 65%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	+333%	+249%	−82%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 333%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	−67%	−73%	+198%	–	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 67%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	1,457	3,942	17,785	2,052	8.7	81.9	–	–
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	2,356	6,398	24,332	2,585	9.4	96.8	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,958	5,452	8,927	1,246	7.2	219	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	1,594	4,506	5,384	1,428	3.8	296	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,745	4,948	2,070	279	7.4	843	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,275	6,400	11,686	1,270	9.2	195	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,332	6,487	3,915	347	11.3	596	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1,672	4,651	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	319	9.10	+3,402%	351 of 355	ClassNK	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.