Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ENERGY GLORY

IMO: 9752565
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Japan (from the 2023 report)
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.93 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd · part of NYK

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

252

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

5.95

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−43%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,995 t

CO₂ emitted

30,422 t

Distance sailed

43,559 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,408 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 216 kg/nm · median 190 (+13%)

152Ranks 257 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 14.4 (−24%)

11.2Faster than 9% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.12 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+14%)

5.06Ranks 235 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU19%
Into the EU79%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

517 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGY GLORY
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

ENERGY GLORY
LNG carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ENERGY GLORY
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−2.5 kn	+43%	+16%	+121%	–	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−40%	−37%	−86%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 40%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+0.8 kn	−9%	−3%	+124%	−50%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.8 kn	−3%	−22%	+204%	+96%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	2,929	7,921	13,573	1,247	10.9	216	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	929	2,565	6,142	457	13.4	151	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,995	30,422	43,559	3,408	12.8	252	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	5,397	14,979	19,403	1,618	12.0	278	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	1,837	5,088	6,375	430	14.8	288	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	8.12	7.12	+14%	235 of 386	ClassNK	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5.95	10.4	−43%	38 of 379	ClassNK	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12.0	10.7	+12%	169 of 267	ClassNK	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6.12	10.9	−44%	22 of 248	ClassNK	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.