Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 11 |
| CO₂ emitted | 360 kt+2.6% |
| Fuel per mile | 261 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 1.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 7 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd9.3 (+30% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd | 11 | 9.3 | +30% | 261 | 14.3 | 3,005 | 1.6% | 7 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd | ClassNK (11) | 55% | 27% | 100% | 0% |
NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUSAIL | 9285952 | LNG carrier | 16.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +130% | 14.0 | 23,635 t | €630k |
| AL UTOURIYA | 9360867 | LNG carrier | 15.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +115% | 13.9 | 40,532 t | €1.1m |
| AL KHORLNG | 9085613 | LNG carrier | 15.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +115% | 13.7 | 19,459 t | €515k |
| AL THUMAMA | 9360843 | LNG carrier | 9.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +34% | 15.2 | 69,696 t | €1.9m |
| LNG SAKURALNG | 9774135 | LNG carrier | 9.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +33% | 13.1 | 22,886 t | €613k |
| AL SAHLA | 9360855 | LNG carrier | 9.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +30% | 15.1 | 85,137 t | €2.3m |
| SHINSHU MARULNG | 9791200 | LNG carrier | 9.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +30% | 13.6 | 20,290 t | €540k |
| GRACE FREESIALNG | 9903920 | LNG carrier | 9.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +29% | 12.7 | 11,162 t | €300k |
| ENERGY GLORYLNG | 9752565 | LNG carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +14% | 10.9 | 7,921 t | €213k |
| BUSHU MARULNG | 9796793 | LNG carrier | 6.8 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −5% | 15.1 | 33,574 t | €896k |
| QUEST KIRISHIMALNG | 9963853 | LNG carrier | 5.9 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −17% | 15.2 | 25,549 t | €687k |
30 of 11 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.