Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM BLUE

IMO: 9756107
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,640 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 15.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEATRADE BLUE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V. · part of Seatrade

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,640 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

98.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.10

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+79%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,122 t

CO₂ emitted

9,788 t

9,942 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,615 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,134 h

89 days, 24% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 98.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−44%)

78.8Ranks 519 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 74% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.10 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+79%)

7.22Ranks 1,667 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU47%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU3%

49% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,774 t).

Fuel burned laden

88%

13% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM BLUE
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM BLUE
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM BLUE
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−7%	−4%	+33%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+2%	−2%	−25%	−29%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+9%	+2%	−18%	+55%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−7%	+0%	+3%	+10%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−10%	−13%	+24%	−28%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+2%	−1%	−4%	+14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+3%	+2%	+90%	+22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	320	1,002	4,085	352	11.6	78.4	36.92	–
2025	CMA CGM SA	3,122	9,788	31,615	2,134	14.8	98.8	29.10	88%
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	2,531	7,963	23,693	1,663	14.3	106.8	28.26	–
2023	not published	3,284	10,340	31,490	2,122	14.8	104.3	39.71	–
2022	not published	3,694	11,587	38,594	2,431	15.9	95.7	25.66	–
2021	not published	3,848	12,092	37,540	2,527	14.9	102.5	23.34	–
2020	not published	3,452	10,827	30,322	1,984	15.3	113.8	32.63	–
2019	not published	3,511	11,014	31,497	2,000	15.8	111.5	28.63	–
2018	not published	1,797	5,617	16,615	1,041	16.0	108.2	23.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2025	CMA CGM SA	29.10	16.30	+79%	1,667 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	28.26	17.52	+61%	1,409 of 1,974	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	39.71	19.40	+105%	1,534 of 1,899	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	25.66	19.13	+34%	1,166 of 1,825	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	23.34	17.90	+30%	1,129 of 1,781	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	32.63	17.58	+86%	1,373 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	28.63	18.88	+52%	1,221 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	23.55	20.22	+16%	996 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.