Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI

IMO: 9757876
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 95,074 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.31 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 95,906 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

256

Container median 174 kg/nm (+47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−56%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

101.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,823 t

CO₂ emitted

64,944 t

Distance sailed

81,390 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,923 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 265 kg/nm · median 165 (+60%)

77.6Ranks 1,593 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.2 (+14%)

10.0Faster than 87% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−55%)

7.34Ranks 302 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU34%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,234 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO SHIPPING DENALI
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2023	−0.7 kn	+6%	+2%	−30%	+18%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−3%	−7%	−68%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−19%	−13%	+176%	−16%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	4,897	15,282	18,497	1,222	15.1	265	8.69	–
2020	not published	6,553	20,451	26,351	1,666	15.8	249	7.36	–
2019	not published	20,823	64,944	81,390	4,923	16.5	256	8.32	–
2018	not published	9,328	29,117	29,473	1,911	15.4	317	9.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	8.69	19.4	−55%	302 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	7.36	17.6	−58%	198 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	8.32	18.9	−56%	215 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.90	20.2	−51%	257 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.