Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARVEL FALCON

IMO: 9760768
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

393

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.3

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+22%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

149.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

25,303 t

CO₂ emitted

70,170 t

Distance sailed

64,367 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,053 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 192 kg/nm · median 190 (+1%)

152Ranks 201 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 14.4 (+10%)

11.2Faster than 89% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.97 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−16%)

5.06Ranks 133 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU50%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,144 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARVEL FALCON
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARVEL FALCON
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MARVEL FALCON
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+8%	+22%	+81%	–	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	−7%	−16%	+269%	–	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2023	+3.0 kn	−53%	−41%	−46%	−82%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 53%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.3 kn	+3%	−19%	−79%	+68%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+8%	+11%	+127%	+8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	9,517	25,897	49,670	3,134	15.8	192	–	–
2024LNG	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	4,893	13,528	27,476	1,957	14.0	178	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,426	3,950	7,452	477	15.6	191	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	5,512	15,208	13,677	1,086	12.6	403	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	25,303	70,170	64,367	4,053	15.9	393	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	10,351	28,901	28,402	1,849	15.4	364	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	5.97	7.12	−16%	133 of 386	ClassNK	B+C
2024LNG	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	3.91	9.10	−57%	8 of 355	ClassNK	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	22.3	10.7	+108%	250 of 267	ClassNK	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13.3	10.9	+22%	172 of 248	ClassNK	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	12.3	10.9	+12%	129 of 197	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.