Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

TESSALA

IMO: 9761243
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 41,578 t
Flag (estimated): Algeria
Port of registry: Oran
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,739 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

367

Gas carrier (LPG) median 91.1 kg/nm (+303%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

33.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 45.9 (−28%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 10.4 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

93.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,263 t

CO₂ emitted

11,789 t

Distance sailed

11,625 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,098 h

46 days, 13% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 278 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+241%)

49.8Ranks 351 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 8.1 kn · median 12.6 (−36%)

8.8Faster than 7% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−50%)

14.4Ranks 89 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

2,170 t

51% of all fuel; 49% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

312 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TESSALA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.0250.0500.0750.01,0001,250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TESSALA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TESSALA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.7 kn	+35%	+1%	−16%	+14%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−5.7 kn	−32%	−56%	+291%	−54%	5.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.6 kn	−11%	+14%	+59%	+32%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+6.5 kn	−8%	+86%	−1%	−31%	6.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.1 kn	−63%	−78%	−70%	−49%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 63%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+176%	+174%	−8%	+129%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 176%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.7 kn	+43%	+155%	−5%	+54%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 43%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	4,620	12,389	16,636	2,050	8.1	278	17.9	47%
2024LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	4,076	10,959	19,800	1,829	10.8	206	15.8	58%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,536	4,263	5,060	306	16.5	304	34.5	43%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	1,088	3,084	3,183	247	12.9	342	26.2	47%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,191	3,383	3,207	504	6.4	371	38.2	44%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10,786	29,972	10,669	1,013	10.5	1,011	75.4	37%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,263	11,789	11,625	1,098	10.6	367	33.0	51%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	3,143	8,733	12,248	2,062	5.9	257	21.4	56%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	17.9	35.6	−50%	89 of 355	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2024LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	15.8	35.8	−56%	40 of 306	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	34.5	41.8	−17%	140 of 330	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	26.2	42.5	−38%	112 of 348	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	38.2	46.9	−19%	128 of 323	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	75.4	42.3	+78%	246 of 339	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	33.0	45.9	−28%	116 of 331	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	21.4	53.1	−60%	52 of 297	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.