Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

OUGARTA

IMO
9761267
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
44,518 t
Port of registry
Oran
Technical efficiency
EIV 7.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 44,518 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
255.9 kg/nm
Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+214%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
15.46
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (−57%)
Average speed
8.9 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−29%)
Fuel per day at sea
54.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,965 t
CO₂ emitted
7,973 t
10,518 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
11,585 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,295 h
54 days, 15% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 255.9 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+214%)
49.8Ranks 350 of 355, lowest first124.4
Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 12.6 (−29%)
8.8Faster than 11% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (−57%)
14.36Ranks 53 of 355, lowest first120.18
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU51%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU7%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,271 t).

Fuel burned laden
57%
43% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
7.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
87.8 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.319
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • OUGARTA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • OUGARTA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • OUGARTA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−3.7 kn+6%−25%−42%−18%3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.4 kn−17%−14%+21%−34%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+1.2 kn−43%−38%+216%−48%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 43%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+2.1 kn−41%−27%+33%+167%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 41%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn+109%+89%+28%−38%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 109%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.5 kn+48%+75%−86%+47%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.4 kn+27%+8%+184%+37%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA2,9657,97311,5851,2958.9255.915.4657%
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA4,84513,02120,0091,58212.6242.118.9542%
2023LNGnot published4,82913,41116,5031,35812.2292.628.8334%
2022LNGnot published2,7057,4715,22747411.0517.555.5833%
2021LNGnot published3,4709,5853,9364438.9881.720.8442%
2020LNGnot published1,3003,6193,0783159.8422.433.7941%
2019LNGnot published6,07316,83621,3092,5698.3285.023.0151%
2018LNGnot published1,6844,6807,4977709.7224.616.8250%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA15.4635.56−57%53 of 355Bureau VeritasB+C
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA18.9535.82−47%68 of 306Bureau VeritasB+C
2023LNGnot published28.8341.77−31%118 of 330Bureau VeritasB+C
2022LNGnot published55.5842.53+31%212 of 348Bureau VeritasB+C
2021LNGnot published20.8446.91−56%59 of 323Bureau VeritasB+C
2020LNGnot published33.7942.29−20%138 of 339Bureau VeritasB+C
2019LNGnot published23.0145.85−50%73 of 331Bureau VeritasB+C
2018LNGnot published16.8253.11−68%29 of 297Bureau VeritasB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

OUGARTA (IMO 9761267): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze