Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

OUGARTA

IMO
9761267
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
44,518 t
Flag (estimated)
Algeria
Port of registry
Oran
Technical efficiency
EIV 7.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,799 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
422
Gas carrier (LPG) median 89.3 kg/nm (+373%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
33.8
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 42.3 (−20%)
Average speed
9.8 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.7 kn (−23%)
Fuel per day at sea
99.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,300 t
CO₂ emitted
3,619 t
Distance sailed
3,078 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
315 h
13 days, 4% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 256 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+214%)
49.8Ranks 350 of 355, lowest first124
Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 12.6 (−29%)
8.8Faster than 11% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−57%)
14.4Ranks 53 of 355, lowest first120
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU59%
  • Into the EU33%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
536 t
41% of all fuel; 59% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
292 t
8.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • OUGARTA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • OUGARTA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • OUGARTA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−3.7 kn+6%−25%−42%−18%3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.4 kn−17%−14%+21%−34%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+1.2 kn−43%−38%+216%−48%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 43%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+2.1 kn−41%−27%+33%+167%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 41%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn+109%+89%+28%−38%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 109%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.5 kn+48%+75%−86%+47%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.4 kn+27%+8%+184%+37%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA2,9657,97311,5851,2958.925615.557%
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA4,84513,02120,0091,58212.624219.042%
2023LNG / alt.not published4,82913,41116,5031,35812.229328.834%
2022LNG / alt.not published2,7057,4715,22747411.051855.633%
2021LNG / alt.not published3,4709,5853,9364438.988220.842%
2020LNG / alt.not published1,3003,6193,0783159.842233.841%
2019LNG / alt.not published6,07316,83621,3092,5698.328523.051%
2018LNG / alt.not published1,6844,6807,4977709.722516.850%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA15.535.6−57%53 of 355Bureau VeritasB+C
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA19.035.8−47%68 of 306Bureau VeritasB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published28.841.8−31%118 of 330Bureau VeritasB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published55.642.5+31%212 of 348Bureau VeritasB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published20.846.9−56%59 of 323Bureau VeritasB+C
2020LNG / alt.not published33.842.3−20%138 of 339Bureau VeritasB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published23.045.9−50%73 of 331Bureau VeritasB+C
2018LNG / alt.not published16.853.1−68%29 of 297Bureau VeritasB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.