Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VISBY

IMO: 9763655
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Visby
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.41 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: VISBORG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DESTINATION GOTLAND AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

206.7 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

402

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

456

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+80%)

Average speed

23.3 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+47%)

Fuel per day at sea

115.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,270 t

CO₂ emitted

52,898 t

62,413 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

88,374 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,785 h

158 days, 43% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 206.7 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+38%)

69.3Ranks 340 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 23.3 kn · median 15.8 (+47%)

12.0Faster than 92% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 402.33 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−29%)

66.76Ranks 166 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 455.76 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+80%)

48.59Ranks 267 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

316.0 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.180

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VISBY
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VISBY
Ro-pax median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VISBY
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VISBY
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−2%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−5%	−5%	+5%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−4%	−6%	−10%	+19%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	+8%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+1%	−1%	+52%	−28%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−1%	−0%	−10%	+27%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	18,270	52,898	88,374	3,785	23.3	206.7	–	–
2024LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	18,371	52,812	90,383	3,886	23.3	203.2	–	–
2023	not published	18,522	57,575	86,300	3,712	23.2	214.6	–	–
2022	not published	21,606	64,762	96,400	4,064	23.7	224.1	–	–
2021LNG	not published	19,431	49,750	89,599	3,775	23.7	216.9	–	–
2020LNG	not published	12,624	36,227	58,800	2,433	24.2	214.7	–	–
2019LNG	not published	14,162	40,635	65,200	2,724	23.9	217.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	402.33	566.51	−29%	166 of 408	455.76	253.18	+80%	DNV	C
2024LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	402.23	546.68	−26%	170 of 404	444.65	232.85	+91%	DNV	C
2023	not published	459.56	680.04	−32%	145 of 386	803.73	233.94	+244%	MRVControl AB	C
2022	not published	384.83	626.32	−39%	146 of 394	679.26	252.90	+169%	MRVControl AB	C
2021LNG	not published	387.50	815.19	−52%	131 of 377	639.14	226.00	+183%	MRVControl AB	C
2020LNG	not published	536.70	750.91	−29%	160 of 387	881.27	217.49	+305%	MRVControl AB	C
2019LNG	not published	421.54	569.03	−26%	156 of 394	748.40	222.56	+236%	MRVControl AB	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.