Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VISBY

IMO: 9763655
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Visby
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.41 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: VISBORG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DESTINATION GOTLAND AB

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

217

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

388

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

639

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+183%)

Average speed

23.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+46%)

Fuel per day at sea

123.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,431 t

CO₂ emitted

49,750 t

Distance sailed

89,599 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,775 h

157 days, 43% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 207 kg/nm · median 150 (+38%)

69.3Ranks 340 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 23.3 kn · median 15.8 (+47%)

12.0Faster than 92% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 402 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−29%)

66.8Ranks 166 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 456 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+80%)

48.6Ranks 267 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,308 t

8.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VISBY
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VISBY
Ro-pax median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VISBY
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VISBY
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−2%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−5%	−5%	+5%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−4%	−6%	−10%	+19%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	+8%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+1%	−1%	+52%	−28%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−1%	−0%	−10%	+27%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	18,270	52,898	88,374	3,785	23.3	207	–	–
2024LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	18,371	52,812	90,383	3,886	23.3	203	–	–
2023	not published	18,522	57,575	86,300	3,712	23.2	215	–	–
2022	not published	21,606	64,762	96,400	4,064	23.7	224	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	19,431	49,750	89,599	3,775	23.7	217	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12,624	36,227	58,800	2,433	24.2	215	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14,162	40,635	65,200	2,724	23.9	217	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	402	567	−29%	166 of 408	456	253	+80%	DNV	C
2024LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	402	547	−26%	170 of 404	445	233	+91%	DNV	C
2023	not published	460	680	−32%	145 of 386	804	234	+244%	MRVControl AB	C
2022	not published	385	626	−39%	146 of 394	679	253	+169%	MRVControl AB	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	388	815	−52%	131 of 377	639	226	+183%	MRVControl AB	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	537	751	−29%	160 of 387	881	217	+305%	MRVControl AB	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	422	569	−26%	156 of 394	748	223	+236%	MRVControl AB	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.