Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

FEDERAL MOSEL

IMO: 9766188
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Canada Jupiter Maritime Co. Limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

69.2 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+96%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

7.16

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−72%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

757 t

CO₂ emitted

2,382 t

2,419 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,943 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

957 h

40 days, 11% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 69.2 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+96%)

17.4Ranks 2,241 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 9.3 (+23%)

7.0Faster than 84% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 7.16 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−72%)

10.14Ranks 78 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU62%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU4%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,343 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FEDERAL MOSEL
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FEDERAL MOSEL
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

FEDERAL MOSEL
General cargo median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+1%	+5%	+40%	−28%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+11%	+3%	−70%	+43%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−20%	−16%	+159%	−78%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+7%	+1%	−70%	+206%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+0%	+10%	+239%	+9%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+17%	+18%	−22%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−10%	+3%	−3%	−1%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Canada Jupiter Maritime Co. Limited	757	2,382	10,943	957	11.4	69.2	–	–
2024	Canada Jupiter Maritime Co. Limited	535	1,695	7,829	708	11.1	68.3	–	–
2023	not published	1,584	4,979	25,717	2,170	11.8	61.6	–	–
2022	not published	764	2,401	9,930	882	11.3	76.9	–	–
2021	not published	2,408	7,633	33,367	2,822	11.8	72.2	–	–
2020	not published	708	2,218	9,848	915	10.8	71.9	–	–
2019	not published	780	2,443	12,697	1,191	10.7	61.4	–	–
2018	not published	890	2,803	13,025	1,402	9.3	68.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Canada Jupiter Maritime Co. Limited	7.16	25.45	−72%	78 of 2,706	DNV	B
2024	Canada Jupiter Maritime Co. Limited	9.93	19.25	−48%	240 of 1,111	DNV	A
2023	not published	6.94	20.67	−66%	69 of 1,045	DNV	A
2022	not published	31.79	21.57	+47%	801 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	10.39	22.70	−54%	107 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	9.55	24.50	−61%	78 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	8.11	24.96	−68%	37 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.19	24.89	−67%	48 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.