Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BRITISH LISTENER

IMO: 9766566
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.43 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BP Shipping Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

263

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.06

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−13%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

79.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,975 t

CO₂ emitted

57,830 t

Distance sailed

76,031 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,069 h

253 days, 69% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 200 kg/nm · median 190 (+5%)

152Ranks 228 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 18.3 kn · median 14.4 (+27%)

11.2Faster than 100% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.27 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+2%)

5.06Ranks 200 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

10,147 t

51% of all fuel; 49% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,041 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BRITISH LISTENER
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BRITISH LISTENER
LNG carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BRITISH LISTENER
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.2 kn	+1%	+15%	−37%	−34%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.7 kn	−12%	+6%	−33%	+33%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−14%	−8%	−58%	−9%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.4 kn	+22%	−4%	+562%	+41%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−16%	−11%	+36%	−29%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+5.9 kn	+11%	+82%	−41%	−12%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BP Shipping Ltd	2,686	7,647	13,424	733	18.3	200	–	0%
2024LNG	BP Shipping Ltd	4,246	12,190	21,373	1,330	16.1	199	–	37%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,161	20,491	31,808	2,374	13.4	225	–	71%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	19,975	57,830	76,031	6,069	12.5	263	–	51%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,476	6,909	11,480	720	15.9	216	–	58%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,159	6,062	8,449	556	15.2	256	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	3,279	9,454	14,255	1,537	9.3	230	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BP Shipping Ltd	7.27	7.12	+2%	200 of 386	ABS	A+C
2024LNG	BP Shipping Ltd	11.0	7.39	+48%	242 of 312	ABS	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8.23	9.10	−10%	158 of 355	ABS	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9.06	10.4	−13%	158 of 379	ABS	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6.43	10.5	−39%	48 of 289	ABS	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.06	10.7	−15%	83 of 267	ABS	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	10.3	10.9	−5%	113 of 248	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.