Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BRITISH MENTOR

IMO
9766578
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Isle of Man
Port of registry
Douglas
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.43 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BP Shipping Ltd

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
260
LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (+1%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.19
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (−41%)
Average speed
15.8 kn
LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+8%)
Fuel per day at sea
98.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,642 t
CO₂ emitted
19,007 t
Distance sailed
25,547 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,614 h
67 days, 18% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 209 kg/nm · median 190 (+10%)
152Ranks 246 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 14.4 (+7%)
11.2Faster than 80% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+50%)
5.06Ranks 313 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports1%
  • From the EU68%
  • Into the EU27%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
6,277 t
95% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
772 t
4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BRITISH MENTOR
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • BRITISH MENTOR
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • BRITISH MENTOR
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.7 kn−7%−11%+79%+71%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+4.6 kn−17%+16%+181%–4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−2.6 kn−3%−21%−86%–2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−1.7 kn+8%−4%+86%+48%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+4.0 kn+28%+72%+310%+34%4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−2.3 kn−2%−18%−35%−72%2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGBP Shipping Ltd7,19119,96834,3652,23715.4209–2%
2024LNGBP Shipping Ltd4,33412,69319,2281,19516.1225–69%
2023LNG / alt.not published1,8565,4556,83459411.5272–0%
2022LNG / alt.not published13,30938,52547,4903,37814.1280–57%
2021LNG / alt.not published6,64219,00725,5471,61415.8260–95%
2020LNG / alt.not published1,2683,5856,23052911.8204––
2019LNG / alt.not published2,0005,6469,58968114.1209––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGBP Shipping Ltd10.77.12+50%313 of 386ABSA+C
2024LNGBP Shipping Ltd6.267.39−15%115 of 312ABS–
2023LNG / alt.not published––––ABS–
2022LNG / alt.not published9.1810.4−12%162 of 379ABS–
2021LNG / alt.not published6.1910.5−41%41 of 289ABS–
2020LNG / alt.not published4.6110.7−57%4 of 267ABS–
2019LNG / alt.not published16.510.9+51%207 of 248ABS–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.