Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GEORGIY BRUSILOV

IMO: 9768382
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC3
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Dynagas Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

318

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+26%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.74

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−35%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

121.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,502 t

CO₂ emitted

67,505 t

Distance sailed

76,947 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,829 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 296 kg/nm · median 190 (+56%)

152Ranks 319 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 14.4 (+7%)

11.2Faster than 81% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.52 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+34%)

5.06Ranks 277 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,532 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GEORGIY BRUSILOV
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GEORGIY BRUSILOV
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GEORGIY BRUSILOV
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−6%	−5%	+1%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	+17%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+10%	+5%	−10%	+72%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	−9%	+8%	+1%	−42%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+3%	−3%	+23%	+1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+1%	+5%	−2%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Dynagas Ltd	24,367	65,308	82,302	5,348	15.4	296	–	–
2024LNG	Dynagas Ltd	25,687	68,721	81,630	5,378	15.2	315	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	24,313	67,576	69,630	4,582	15.2	349	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	24,502	67,505	76,947	4,829	15.9	318	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	26,556	73,642	75,822	5,626	13.5	350	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	21,124	58,202	61,887	4,328	14.3	341	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	21,428	60,090	63,188	4,635	13.6	339	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Dynagas Ltd	9.52	7.12	+34%	277 of 386	EMICERT	A+C
2024LNG	Dynagas Ltd	10.4	7.39	+40%	228 of 312	EMICERT	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.6	9.10	+27%	256 of 355	EMICERT	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.74	10.4	−35%	78 of 379	EMICERT	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.6	10.5	+11%	170 of 289	EMICERT	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.5	10.7	+7%	158 of 267	EMICERT	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	12.2	10.9	+13%	159 of 248	EMICERT	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.