Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BORIS DAVYDOV

IMO: 9768394
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.22 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC3
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Dynagas Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

330

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+43%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+21%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

111.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

29,662 t

CO₂ emitted

82,169 t

Distance sailed

89,932 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,372 h

266 days, 73% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 300 kg/nm · median 190 (+58%)

152Ranks 325 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

11.2Faster than 79% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.60 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+35%)

5.06Ranks 279 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,619 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BORIS DAVYDOV
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BORIS DAVYDOV
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BORIS DAVYDOV
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−1%	−5%	−17%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−8%	+3%	+3%	−12%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+1%	−3%	+31%	+10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	−13%	−2%	+52%	−12%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+7%	+5%	−37%	−15%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+0%	−5%	+46%	+24%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Dynagas Ltd	23,016	61,603	76,714	5,012	15.3	300	–	–
2024LNG	Dynagas Ltd	28,158	75,295	92,631	5,850	15.8	304	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	29,662	82,169	89,932	6,372	14.1	330	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	22,362	61,855	68,811	4,678	14.7	325	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	16,939	47,403	45,410	3,473	13.1	373	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	25,255	70,176	72,607	5,411	13.4	348	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	17,202	47,472	49,692	3,506	14.2	346	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Dynagas Ltd	9.60	7.12	+35%	279 of 386	EMICERT	A+C
2024LNG	Dynagas Ltd	9.75	7.39	+32%	215 of 312	EMICERT	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.0	9.10	+21%	242 of 355	EMICERT	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10.1	10.4	−3%	184 of 379	EMICERT	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.4	10.5	+9%	165 of 289	EMICERT	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	10.7	+26%	196 of 267	EMICERT	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	10.8	10.9	−0%	121 of 248	EMICERT	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.