ONE TRIBUTE

IMO: 9769295
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 108,514 t
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL TRIBUTE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP · part of Bernhard Schulte

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 108,514 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

248.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.12

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−56%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

80.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,943 t

CO₂ emitted

33,989 t

34,526 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,992 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,265 h

136 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 248.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+41%)

78.8Ranks 1,638 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 52% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−56%)

7.22Ranks 208 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU62%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU3%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (18,434 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ONE TRIBUTE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE TRIBUTE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE TRIBUTE
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−11%	−13%	−4%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+16%	+21%	+44%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−11%	−12%	+10%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−7%	−8%	−19%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−2.0 kn	+7%	−7%	−46%	+10%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	−2%	+31%	+128%	−47%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+2%	−7%	+3%	+31%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	10,943	33,989	43,992	3,265	13.5	248.8	7.12	–
2024	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	12,740	39,779	45,700	3,309	13.8	278.8	–	–
2023	not published	7,663	23,941	31,795	2,401	13.2	241.0	6.16	–
2022	not published	7,813	24,459	28,817	2,145	13.4	271.1	7.69	–
2021	not published	10,416	32,567	35,653	2,623	13.6	292.2	6.04	–
2020	not published	18,100	56,499	66,185	4,251	15.6	273.5	5.48	–
2019	not published	8,105	25,341	28,976	2,487	11.7	279.7	10.35	–
2018	not published	7,663	23,977	28,056	2,188	12.8	273.1	7.89	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	7.12	16.30	−56%	208 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	6.16	19.40	−68%	74 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	7.69	19.13	−60%	197 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	6.04	17.90	−66%	59 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	5.48	17.58	−69%	18 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	10.35	18.88	−45%	347 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	7.89	20.22	−61%	128 of 1,705	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.