Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Bernhard Schulteyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Bernhard Schulte | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 45 |
| CO₂ emitted | 570 kt+36.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 141 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 11 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- Bernhard Schulte6.0 (−16% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernhard Schulte | 11 | 6.0 | −16% | 177 | 14.9 | 2,767 | 1.7% | 11 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Bernhard Schulte6.3 (−21% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernhard Schulte | 20 | 6.3 | −21% | 86 | 11.1 | 2,062 | 2.6% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Bernhard Schulte8.8 (−46% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernhard Schulte | 4 | 8.8 | −46% | 205 | 14.0 | 3,687 | 2.7% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Con-ro
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 9.9
- Bernhard Schulte15.9 (+60% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernhard Schulte | 2 | 15.9 | +60% | 74 | 13.9 | 5,702 | 5.7% | – |
| Segment median | 9.9 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Bernhard Schulte9.3 (−38% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernhard Schulte | 4 | 9.3 | −38% | 82 | 11.7 | 1,579 | 6.0% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Bernhard Schulte10.8 (+36% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernhard Schulte | 3 | 10.8 | +36% | 91 | 11.8 | 1,510 | 3.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
Bernhard Schulte: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANDALUCIA EXPRESS | 9331206 | Con-ro | 16.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +63% | 13.9 | 18,198 t | €0 |
| CANARIAS EXPRESS | 9331191 | Con-ro | 15.6 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +57% | 13.9 | 18,151 t | €0 |
| NORDIC ODYSSEY | 9529451 | Bulk carrier | 6.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +27% | 10.9 | 16,520 t | €485k |
| GIA INSPIRATION | 9948413 | Bulk carrier | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +13% | 12.2 | 7,531 t | €211k |
| ORION JESSICALNG | 9917543 | LNG carrier | 7.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +9% | 13.7 | 6,386 t | €173k |
| CMC ANTILLANCA | 9681120 | Oil tanker | 10.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +5% | 11.7 | 8,079 t | €232k |
| LARGO ATOM | 1034747 | Oil tanker | 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +4% | 11.7 | 4,744 t | €140k |
| TENERGYLNG | 9892456 | LNG carrier | 7.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +4% | 15.0 | 34,080 t | €910k |
| ONE TRIBUTE | 9769295 | Container | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | 0% | 13.5 | 33,989 t | €968k |
| ORION IRISLNG | 9956604 | LNG carrier | 7.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −2% | 13.2 | 33,227 t | €886k |
| GIA GLORY | 9877913 | Bulk carrier | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −2% | 10.7 | 5,716 t | €154k |
| AMELIA | 9624768 | Chemical tanker | 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | −2% | 11.3 | 7,814 t | €251k |
| PACIFIC TAURUS | 1034008 | Chemical tanker | 7.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −3% | 12.5 | 3,749 t | €113k |
| NORDIC OLYMPIC | 9727118 | Bulk carrier | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −4% | 10.5 | 10,045 t | €278k |
| ONE TRADITION | 9769300 | Container | 6.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −6% | 15.2 | 43,569 t | €1.2m |
| NORD MIYAKO | 9890927 | Chemical tanker | 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | −8% | 11.5 | 3,720 t | €105k |
| ORION SEALNG | 9889904 | LNG carrier | 6.6 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −8% | 14.6 | 37,158 t | €990k |
| TM LUSTROUS | 9897925 | Bulk carrier | 7.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −9% | 11.3 | 9,363 t | €266k |
| ORION MONETLNG | 9888766 | LNG carrier | 6.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −13% | 17.2 | 5,407 t | €145k |
| ELIZABETH M II | 9863807 | Bulk carrier | 5.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −15% | 11.6 | 3,632 t | €97k |
| SHINE AMBER | 9971458 | Bulk carrier | 5.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −15% | 11.1 | 3,933 t | €106k |
| NORD MINAMI | 9883041 | Chemical tanker | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −16% | 12.1 | 3,799 t | €110k |
| GUI YINGLNG | 9878888 | LNG carrier | 6.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −16% | 16.5 | 24,818 t | €658k |
| SFL MAUI | 9635688 | Container | 12.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −16% | 14.3 | 25,553 t | €746k |
| LNG GENEVALNG | 9892133 | LNG carrier | 5.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −22% | 16.0 | 24,005 t | €645k |
| CAIPIRINHA | 9714769 | Bulk carrier | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −23% | 10.5 | 1,028 t | €32k |
| MAI TAI | 9709221 | Bulk carrier | 7.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −26% | 11.4 | 2,586 t | €80k |
| SFL HAWAII | 9679555 | Container | 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −27% | 13.3 | 29,609 t | €827k |
| UMM AL HOULLNG | 9977244 | LNG carrier | 5.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −27% | 14.2 | 12,459 t | €331k |
| PACIFIC IRIS | 1073652 | Bulk carrier | 3.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −27% | 10.9 | 1,367 t | €36k |
30 of 45 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.