ONE TRADITION

IMO: 9769300
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 127,185 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL TRADITION

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP · part of Bernhard Schulte

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 111,476 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

242

Container median 165 kg/nm (+47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.79

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−65%)

Average speed

13.9 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

80.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,983 t

CO₂ emitted

31,200 t

Distance sailed

41,219 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,972 h

124 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 272 kg/nm · median 177 (+54%)

78.8Ranks 1,811 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 79% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−59%)

7.22Ranks 144 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU88%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,042 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE TRADITION
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE TRADITION
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE TRADITION
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	+4%	+26%	+30%	–	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+8%	−2%	−4%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−17%	−26%	+49%	−3%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	+5%	+23%	+17%	+13%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	−3%	−16%	−46%	+9%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−1%	+19%	+45%	−48%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	+5%	+10%	+8%	+23%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	14,015	43,569	51,591	3,396	15.2	272	6.64	–
2024	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	10,344	32,309	39,650	3,158	12.6	261	–	–
2023	not published	9,983	31,200	41,219	2,972	13.9	242	6.79	–
2022	not published	8,058	25,206	27,656	1,780	15.5	291	6.98	–
2021	not published	6,552	20,550	23,699	1,774	13.4	277	6.19	–
2020	not published	12,521	39,120	43,973	2,842	15.5	285	5.70	–
2019	not published	8,691	27,143	30,290	2,344	12.9	287	11.1	–
2018	not published	7,693	24,111	28,122	2,283	12.3	274	9.01	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	6.64	16.3	−59%	144 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	BERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (HONG KONG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	6.79	19.4	−65%	135 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	6.98	19.1	−64%	137 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	6.19	17.9	−65%	75 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	5.70	17.6	−68%	31 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	11.1	18.9	−41%	406 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	9.01	20.2	−55%	196 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.