Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MYRINA

IMO: 9770933
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau, Bahamas
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.09 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

236

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.95

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−24%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

82.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,638 t

CO₂ emitted

43,563 t

Distance sailed

66,182 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,575 h

191 days, 52% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 182 kg/nm · median 190 (−5%)

152Ranks 157 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.4 (+5%)

11.2Faster than 69% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.30 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−26%)

5.06Ranks 64 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU44%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,329 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MYRINA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MYRINA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MYRINA
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−4%	−9%	+57%	−16%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−20%	−12%	−53%	−9%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+7%	+10%	+1,199%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+3.1 kn	−39%	−22%	−76%	–	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−6.6 kn	+33%	−16%	+27%	+63%	6.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	+25%	+56%	−15%	+26%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	8,834	24,462	48,656	3,231	15.1	182	–	59%
2024LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	5,860	16,198	31,042	1,959	15.8	189	–	54%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	15,638	43,563	66,182	4,575	14.5	236	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	1,121	3,136	5,096	360	14.1	220	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7,493	20,841	20,802	1,884	11.0	360	–	73%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	4,433	12,349	16,405	931	17.6	270	–	57%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,145	11,559	19,201	1,356	14.2	216	–	61%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	5.30	7.12	−26%	64 of 386	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2024LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	6.33	7.39	−14%	119 of 312	Lloyd's Register	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.95	9.10	−24%	104 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.8	10.5	+13%	176 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7.28	10.7	−32%	40 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5.79	10.9	−47%	17 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.