Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE TRUTH

IMO: 9773210
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 105,789 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.46 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL TRUTH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. · part of Shoei

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 140,097 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

283

Container median 174 kg/nm (+62%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.29

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−67%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

107.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,268 t

CO₂ emitted

47,611 t

Distance sailed

54,029 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,410 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 243 kg/nm · median 177 (+38%)

78.8Ranks 1,594 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 29% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−56%)

7.22Ranks 216 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU46%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,043 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE TRUTH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE TRUTH
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE TRUTH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	+4%	−6%	+32%	–	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	+9%	+23%	+17%	–	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	−23%	−34%	+16%	−6%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−5%	−15%	−4%	+11%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+6%	+4%	−49%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−2%	−5%	+8%	−10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+10%	+16%	−4%	−4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	12,578	39,192	51,670	4,377	11.8	243	7.17	–
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	9,099	28,441	39,023	2,963	13.2	233	–	–
2023	not published	7,134	22,345	33,327	2,868	11.6	214	6.62	–
2022	not published	8,004	25,090	28,819	2,135	13.5	278	7.08	–
2021	not published	8,799	27,565	30,156	1,985	15.2	292	6.37	–
2020	not published	16,168	50,454	58,588	3,802	15.4	276	5.65	–
2019	not published	15,268	47,611	54,029	3,410	15.8	283	6.29	–
2018	not published	14,351	44,868	56,107	3,712	15.1	256	6.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	7.17	16.3	−56%	216 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	6.62	19.4	−66%	116 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	7.08	19.1	−63%	146 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	6.37	17.9	−64%	91 of 1,781	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	5.65	17.6	−68%	27 of 1,797	ClassNK	B+C
2019	not published	6.29	18.9	−67%	55 of 1,788	ClassNK	B+C
2018	not published	6.55	20.2	−68%	27 of 1,705	ClassNK	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.