Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC SHUBA B

IMO: 9778076
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 99,781 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.20 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 66,548 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

272

Container median 182 kg/nm (+50%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−37%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

89.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,084 t

CO₂ emitted

37,746 t

Distance sailed

44,382 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,238 h

135 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 296 kg/nm · median 165 (+79%)

77.6Ranks 1,724 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.2 (+11%)

10.0Faster than 78% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−52%)

7.34Ranks 338 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU32%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,393 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC SHUBA B
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

MSC SHUBA B
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC SHUBA B
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+5%	−0%	−70%	−17%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−6%	−12%	−35%	+3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+14%	+16%	+103%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+11%	+26%	−32%	−8%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−12%	−9%	−23%	+2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	2,695	8,475	9,094	623	14.6	296	9.34	–
2022	not published	8,530	26,586	30,135	1,966	15.3	283	11.3	–
2021	not published	14,099	43,933	46,628	2,845	16.4	302	10.9	–
2020	not published	6,081	19,001	22,994	1,427	16.1	265	12.0	–
2019	not published	8,122	25,377	33,982	2,402	14.1	239	13.0	–
2018	not published	12,084	37,746	44,382	3,238	13.7	272	12.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	9.34	19.4	−52%	338 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	11.3	19.1	−41%	429 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	10.9	17.9	−39%	395 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.0	17.6	−32%	507 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.0	18.9	−31%	508 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	12.8	20.2	−37%	416 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.