Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC YASHI B

IMO: 9778090
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 71,703 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 71,703 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

300.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+70%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.05

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−20%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

113.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,337 t

CO₂ emitted

50,902 t

51,705 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

54,399 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,464 h

144 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 300.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+70%)

78.8Ranks 1,976 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.05 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−20%)

7.22Ranks 863 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU36%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU5%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (29,908 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.8 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC YASHI B
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC YASHI B
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC YASHI B
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	+3%	+13%	−2%	+2%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+10%	+18%	+5%	−13%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.0 kn	−15%	−31%	+53%	+20%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+4%	+1%	−33%	+8%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+8%	+9%	+85%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	+19%	+33%	−10%	−5%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−17%	−14%	−38%	−12%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	16,337	50,902	54,399	3,464	15.7	300.3	13.05	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	16,256	50,656	55,730	3,896	14.3	291.7	12.81	–
2023	not published	14,119	44,008	53,221	3,999	13.3	265.3	14.78	–
2022	not published	10,936	34,084	34,857	2,140	16.3	313.7	12.33	–
2021	not published	15,695	48,892	52,195	3,102	16.8	300.7	11.39	–
2020	not published	7,885	24,556	28,257	1,705	16.6	279.1	11.32	–
2019	not published	7,391	23,099	31,397	2,130	14.7	235.4	11.87	–
2018	not published	14,275	44,598	50,458	3,549	14.2	282.9	13.53	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	13.05	16.30	−20%	863 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.81	17.52	−27%	671 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	14.78	19.40	−24%	722 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	12.33	19.13	−36%	507 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	11.39	17.90	−36%	427 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	11.32	17.58	−36%	462 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	11.87	18.88	−37%	436 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	13.53	20.22	−33%	464 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.