Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC NITYA B

IMO: 9778117
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 78,881 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.22 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 69,846 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

280

Container median 172 kg/nm (+63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−29%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

101.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,976 t

CO₂ emitted

46,652 t

Distance sailed

53,477 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,560 h

148 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 300 kg/nm · median 177 (+70%)

78.8Ranks 1,976 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−27%)

7.22Ranks 784 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU28%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,029 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC NITYA B
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC NITYA B
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC NITYA B
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+3%	−1%	−4%	−3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.4 kn	+10%	+38%	−45%	−18%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−11%	−21%	+38%	+16%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−2%	−16%	−30%	+12%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	+9%	+23%	−7%	−8%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+5%	−0%	+91%	−10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	−5%	+3%	−43%	+4%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	7,601	23,755	25,328	1,613	15.7	300	11.9	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7,655	23,879	26,339	1,607	16.4	291	12.3	–
2023	not published	12,690	39,536	47,909	3,688	13.0	265	14.9	–
2022	not published	10,362	32,312	34,634	2,372	14.6	299	12.9	–
2021	not published	15,149	47,199	49,481	2,923	16.9	306	11.5	–
2020	not published	14,976	46,652	53,477	3,560	15.0	280	12.5	–
2019	not published	7,480	23,376	28,002	1,775	15.8	267	13.9	–
2018	not published	13,831	43,210	49,060	3,367	14.6	282	13.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	11.9	16.3	−27%	784 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.3	17.5	−30%	630 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.9	19.4	−23%	725 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	12.9	19.1	−33%	538 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	11.5	17.9	−36%	438 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.5	17.6	−29%	539 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.9	18.9	−26%	565 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	13.4	20.2	−34%	452 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.