Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

GLENPARK

IMO
9781621
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
United Kingdom
Port of registry
London
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.55 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Mountpark Shipping Company Limited

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
55.7
General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (−7%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
6.03
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (−71%)
Average speed
10.8 kn
General cargo median 10.5 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,622 t
CO₂ emitted
5,093 t
Distance sailed
29,143 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,688 h
112 days, 31% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.6 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+143%)
17.4Ranks 2,568 of 2,723, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 9.3 (+13%)
6.9Faster than 73% of general cargo ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 8.74 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−66%)
10.2Ranks 174 of 2,723, lowest first52.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports30%
  • From the EU28%
  • Into the EU39%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
1,510 t
93% of all fuel; 7% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
163 t
3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GLENPARK
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • GLENPARK
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GLENPARK
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2025−0.3 kn+54%+50%−68%+45%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 54%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.6 kn−13%−17%+376%−49%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022–––––
2020→2021–––––
2019→2020+3.2 kn+7%+44%−40%+4%3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Mountpark Shipping Company Limited7892,4619,21087310.585.6–89%
2023not published1,6225,09329,1432,68810.855.7–93%
2022not published3901,2336,12553811.463.7–50%
2021not published00–0––––
2020not published6291,9838,98871112.670.07.56100%
2019not published9823,06315,0121,6049.465.47.2789%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025Mountpark Shipping Company Limited8.7425.5−66%174 of 2,723ABSB+C
2023not published6.0320.7−71%30 of 1,045ABSC
2022not published11.721.6−46%181 of 1,034ABSC
2021not published––––ABSC
2020not published7.568.24−8%1,292 of 3,150ABSC
2019not published7.278.38−13%1,216 of 3,360ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.