Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GOTLAND

IMO: 9783071
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Visby
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DESTINATION GOTLAND AB

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

214

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

414

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−39%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

769

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+229%)

Average speed

23.3 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+46%)

Fuel per day at sea

119.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,706 t

CO₂ emitted

61,174 t

Distance sailed

91,920 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,944 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 200 kg/nm · median 150 (+33%)

69.3Ranks 328 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 23.2 kn · median 15.8 (+47%)

12.0Faster than 92% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 391 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−31%)

66.8Ranks 162 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 426 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+68%)

48.6Ranks 256 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,432 t

5.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GOTLAND
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOTLAND
Ro-pax median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

GOTLAND
Ro-pax median

200400600800

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

GOTLAND
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−6%	−6%	−2%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	−7%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−5%	−6%	+6%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+7%	+5%	+0%	+13%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+1%	−1%	+45%	−31%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	16,711	47,882	83,718	3,610	23.2	200	–	–
2024LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	18,139	52,292	85,248	3,664	23.3	213	–	–
2023	not published	19,706	61,174	91,920	3,944	23.3	214	–	–
2022	not published	19,617	58,863	86,799	3,703	23.4	226	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	18,289	47,636	86,500	3,622	23.9	211	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12,483	35,315	59,500	2,448	24.3	210	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	391	567	−31%	162 of 408	426	253	+68%	DNV	C
2024LNG	DESTINATION GOTLAND AB	430	547	−21%	177 of 404	460	233	+98%	DNV	C
2023	not published	414	680	−39%	134 of 386	769	234	+229%	MRVControl AB	C
2022	not published	397	626	−37%	150 of 394	678	253	+168%	MRVControl AB	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	350	815	−57%	124 of 377	579	226	+156%	MRVControl AB	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	507	751	−33%	151 of 387	794	217	+265%	MRVControl AB	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.