Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MINERVA EVROPI

IMO: 9785237
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 83,675 t
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.64 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Minerva Marine Inc · part of Minerva

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 83,675 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

131.6 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

4.93

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−38%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,869 t

CO₂ emitted

24,667 t

25,054 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

59,797 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,826 h

243 days, 67% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 131.6 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+2%)

76.1Ranks 901 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.7 (−4%)

8.0Faster than 37% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.93 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−38%)

4.51Ranks 250 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports40%
From the EU39%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU5%

72% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (17,840 t).

Fuel burned laden

65%

36% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MINERVA EVROPI
Oil tanker median

110.0120.0130.0140.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MINERVA EVROPI
Oil tanker median

9.09.510.010.511.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MINERVA EVROPI
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+8%	+3%	+53%	−12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+0%	+3%	−21%	−2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.3 kn	−15%	−3%	+68%	−49%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+19%	+14%	+38%	+95%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−51%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−11%	−15%	+55%	+55%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+0%	−6%	−43%	−35%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Minerva Marine Inc	7,869	24,667	59,797	5,826	10.3	131.6	4.93	65%
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	4,754	14,882	39,134	3,633	10.8	121.5	5.58	61%
2023	not published	5,993	18,786	49,578	4,721	10.5	120.9	5.72	–
2022	not published	4,213	13,264	29,548	3,204	9.2	142.6	11.18	–
2021	not published	2,549	8,069	21,341	2,216	9.6	119.4	5.74	–
2020	not published	4,972	15,940	43,365	4,448	9.7	114.7	5.88	–
2019	not published	3,596	11,238	28,058	2,736	10.3	128.2	3.79	–
2018	not published	6,325	19,780	49,409	4,541	10.9	128.0	5.83	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Minerva Marine Inc	4.93	7.95	−38%	250 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	5.58	8.06	−31%	397 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	5.72	8.44	−32%	368 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	11.18	8.51	+31%	1,322 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	5.74	8.86	−35%	361 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	5.88	9.03	−35%	340 of 1,870	RINA	A
2019	not published	3.79	8.83	−57%	115 of 1,919	RINA	A
2018	not published	5.83	8.86	−34%	404 of 1,779	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.