Navalyze · Container · Ship

POLAR ECUADOR

IMO: 9786774
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 35,297 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 11.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,297 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

138.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.31

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−24%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

50.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,292 t

CO₂ emitted

13,426 t

13,637 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,900 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,039 h

85 days, 23% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 138.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−22%)

78.8Ranks 841 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 79% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.31 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−24%)

7.22Ranks 810 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU23%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU1%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,639 t).

Fuel burned laden

99%

1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

0.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

POLAR ECUADOR
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

POLAR ECUADOR
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

POLAR ECUADOR
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2025	+2.4 kn	−11%	+6%	+173%	−57%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+9%	−6%	−82%	+84%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+0%	−5%	−1%	+9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+12%	+15%	−19%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−13%	−23%	+17%	−73%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	4,292	13,426	30,900	2,039	15.2	138.9	12.31	99%
2022	not published	1,755	5,474	11,301	881	12.8	155.3	28.85	90%
2021	not published	9,102	28,343	64,053	4,296	14.9	142.1	15.67	–
2020	not published	9,130	28,435	64,589	4,109	15.7	141.4	14.42	100%
2019	not published	10,029	31,231	79,431	5,182	15.3	126.3	14.44	100%
2018	not published	9,835	30,701	67,650	3,927	17.2	145.4	52.53	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	12.31	16.30	−24%	810 of 2,208	ABS	C
2022	not published	28.85	19.13	+51%	1,270 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	15.67	17.90	−12%	760 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	14.42	17.58	−18%	704 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	14.44	18.88	−24%	610 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	52.53	20.22	+160%	1,519 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.