Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GENIUS

IMO: 9786815
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 122,929 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. · part of Shoei

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 117,111 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

313

Container median 178 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.35

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−56%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

114.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,150 t

CO₂ emitted

56,682 t

Distance sailed

57,964 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,808 h

159 days, 43% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 338 kg/nm · median 177 (+91%)

78.8Ranks 2,124 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 13.3 (+25%)

9.1Faster than 96% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.56 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−47%)

7.22Ranks 413 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU38%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,842 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GENIUS
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GENIUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GENIUS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+4%	−3%	−12%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	+5%	+13%	+34%	–	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−1%	+8%	+10%	−6%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−12%	−24%	−19%	+16%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−1%	−2%	+48%	−0%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+10%	+9%	−31%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−11%	−12%	+100%	−9%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	25,349	78,970	75,047	4,511	16.6	338	8.56	–
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	27,693	86,306	85,438	4,784	17.9	324	–	–
2023	not published	19,655	61,327	63,599	3,832	16.6	309	7.83	–
2022	not published	18,150	56,682	57,964	3,808	15.2	313	8.35	–
2021	not published	25,408	79,199	71,132	4,056	17.5	357	7.21	–
2020	not published	17,303	54,025	48,183	2,702	17.8	359	7.22	–
2019	not published	22,899	71,643	69,911	3,881	18.0	328	7.16	–
2018	not published	12,859	40,176	35,042	1,915	18.3	367	7.83	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	8.56	16.3	−47%	413 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	7.83	19.4	−60%	230 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	8.35	19.1	−56%	228 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	7.21	17.9	−60%	157 of 1,781	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	7.22	17.6	−59%	185 of 1,797	ClassNK	B+C
2019	not published	7.16	18.9	−62%	129 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B+C
2018	not published	7.83	20.2	−61%	123 of 1,705	ClassNK	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.