Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MINERVA ELEFTHERIA

IMO: 9787168
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 42,896 t
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Minerva Marine Inc · part of Minerva

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,474 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

137

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.88

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (−24%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,011 t

CO₂ emitted

22,398 t

Distance sailed

51,288 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,036 h

210 days, 57% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 130 kg/nm · median 129 (+1%)

76.1Ranks 867 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 7.6 kn · median 10.7 (−29%)

8.0Faster than 8% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+20%)

4.51Ranks 1,031 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU38%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,076 t

9.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MINERVA ELEFTHERIA
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MINERVA ELEFTHERIA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MINERVA ELEFTHERIA
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−1%	−11%	−44%	+18%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.9 kn	−34%	+23%	+114%	−53%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	+47%	−0%	+1%	+150%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 47%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.5 kn	+2%	−26%	−45%	+31%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−3%	−12%	−26%	−24%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−1%	+8%	+36%	−4%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	+3%	+14%	+151%	+11%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Minerva Marine Inc	3,306	10,419	25,380	3,335	7.6	130	9.57	50%
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	5,917	18,550	45,117	5,304	8.5	131	8.13	52%
2023	not published	4,176	13,173	21,064	4,599	4.6	198	17.2	–
2022	not published	2,813	8,865	20,861	3,080	6.8	135	6.89	–
2021	not published	5,028	15,887	38,054	4,103	9.3	132	5.25	–
2020	not published	7,011	22,398	51,288	5,036	10.2	137	6.88	–
2019	not published	5,203	16,297	37,685	4,060	9.3	138	7.15	–
2018	not published	2,013	6,312	15,038	1,795	8.4	134	6.42	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Minerva Marine Inc	9.57	7.95	+20%	1,031 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	8.13	8.06	+1%	904 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	17.2	8.44	+104%	1,479 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	6.89	8.51	−19%	659 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	5.25	8.86	−41%	270 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	6.88	9.03	−24%	546 of 1,870	RINA	A
2019	not published	7.15	8.83	−19%	645 of 1,919	RINA	A
2018	not published	6.42	8.86	−28%	487 of 1,779	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.