Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

ECO DOMINATOR

IMO: 9789532
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,693 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,693 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

56.0 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−31%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

105

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+195%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

898 t

CO₂ emitted

2,846 t

2,890 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

16,047 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,321 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 56.0 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−31%)

49.8Ranks 53 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 12.6 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 44% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 104.74 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+195%)

14.36Ranks 302 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU34%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU5%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,017 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ECO DOMINATOR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

40.060.080.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ECO DOMINATOR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ECO DOMINATOR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0100120

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−7%	−4%	−26%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	+13%	+27%	−16%	+8%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+15%	+10%	−12%	+18%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+2%	−9%	+10%	−3%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−14%	−7%	+8%	−7%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+2%	+19%	−4%	−8%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.	898	2,846	16,047	1,321	12.2	56.0	104.74	–
2024	STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.	1,308	4,195	21,695	1,849	11.7	60.3	110.33	–
2023	not published	1,386	4,442	25,872	2,476	10.4	53.5	102.32	–
2022	not published	1,369	4,390	29,401	2,700	10.9	46.6	86.38	–
2021	not published	1,225	3,889	26,678	2,200	12.1	45.9	89.31	–
2020	not published	1,326	4,152	24,742	2,211	11.2	53.6	95.74	–
2019	not published	1,354	4,243	25,742	2,690	9.6	52.6	103.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.	104.74	35.56	+195%	302 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.	110.33	35.82	+208%	266 of 306	DNV	A
2023	not published	102.32	41.77	+145%	271 of 330	DNV	A
2022	not published	86.38	42.53	+103%	271 of 348	DNV	A
2021	not published	89.31	46.91	+90%	246 of 323	DNV	A
2020	not published	95.74	42.29	+126%	270 of 339	DNV	A
2019	not published	103.66	45.85	+126%	277 of 331	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.