Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.your view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 29 |
| CO₂ emitted | 192 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 101 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Gas carrier (LPG) |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8
- STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.40.7 (+14% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A. | 14 | 40.7 | +14% | 69 | 12.9 | 2,527 | 6.4% | – |
| Segment median | 35.8 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.8.1 (+1% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A. | 12 | 8.1 | +1% | 169 | 11.2 | 1,221 | 5.5% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.21.0 (+26% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A. | 3 | 21.0 | +26% | 134 | 11.2 | 1,911 | 12.3% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A. | DNV (29) | 69% | 14% | 41% | 0% |
STEALTH MARITIME CORP. S.A.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGIC WAND | 9379143 | Chemical tanker | 21.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | +75% | 10.2 | 10,081 t | €181k |
| CLEAN IMPERIAL | 9376854 | Chemical tanker | 28.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +71% | 11.3 | 8,645 t | €200k |
| CHIOS LION | 9398280 | Oil tanker | 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +70% | 11.4 | 7,989 t | €124k |
| SUEZ ENCHANTED | 9318084 | Oil tanker | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +53% | 10.6 | 7,871 t | €127k |
| CHRYSALIS | 9437684 | Oil tanker | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +50% | 11.1 | 5,845 t | €92k |
| SUEZ PROTOPIA | 9380893 | Oil tanker | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +49% | 11.3 | 5,658 t | €91k |
| CRUDE CENTURION | 9436020 | Oil tanker | 8.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +33% | 10.9 | 7,055 t | €132k |
| SEA HYMN | 9412036 | Oil tanker | 7.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +24% | 10.3 | 8,633 t | €144k |
| AQUADISIAC | 9396713 | Chemical tanker | 14.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | +21% | 12.1 | 8,603 t | €138k |
| ECO ICE | 9755646 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 41.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +19% | 12.4 | 10,864 t | €236k |
| ECO FREEZE | 9755658 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 40.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +16% | 13.2 | 16,638 t | €343k |
| AFRAPEARL II | 9437672 | Oil tanker | 9.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.4 | +8% | 12.2 | 11,207 t | €192k |
| PALLADIUM | 9773923 | Oil tanker | 6.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +8% | 11.4 | 8,906 t | €145k |
| ECO MERLIN | 9929194 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +3% | 13.0 | 14,714 t | €232k |
| CLEAN NIRVANA | 9308168 | Oil tanker | 25.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | 0% | 12.4 | 5,947 t | €103k |
| ECO DOMINATOR | 9789532 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 110 g CO₂/t·nm | 114 | −3% | 11.7 | 4,195 t | €126k |
| GAS HARALAMBOS | 9423126 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 57.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 65.9 | −12% | 12.4 | 4,737 t | €81k |
| ECO SORCERER | 9933468 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 18.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −17% | 13.7 | 11,025 t | €172k |
| ECO ENCHANTED | 9945796 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 28.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | −19% | 14.4 | 2,361 t | €38k |
| ECO ARCTIC | 9746683 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 28.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | −20% | 13.9 | 3,849 t | €62k |
| ECO WIZARD | 9941568 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −21% | 12.3 | 3,910 t | €63k |
| ECO NICAL | 9746774 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 82.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 114 | −27% | 13.1 | 5,071 t | €86k |
| GAS ESCO | 9507752 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 81.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 114 | −28% | 11.5 | 998 t | €21k |
| CLEAN JUSTICE | 9473717 | Oil tanker | 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | −39% | 10.0 | 4,103 t | €66k |
30 of 29 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.