Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MTM KEY WEST

IMO
9790672
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
21,450 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.52 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd · part of MTM Ship Management

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,450 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
69.3 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (−14%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.09
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.73 (−40%)
Average speed
10.4 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (−5%)
Fuel per day at sea
17.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,062 t
CO₂ emitted
3,318 t
3,370 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
15,331 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,468 h
61 days, 17% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 69.3 kg/nm · median 80.8 (−14%)
53.8Ranks 385 of 1,274, lowest first110.8
Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 11.0 (−5%)
8.7Faster than 37% of chemical tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (−40%)
8.47Ranks 256 of 1,274, lowest first41.97
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU74%
  • Into the EU8%
  • At berth in the EU5%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,959 t).

Fuel burned laden
95%
5% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
5.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MTM KEY WEST
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • MTM KEY WEST
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MTM KEY WEST
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024+4.9 kn−40%+14%+786%−60%4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 40%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023−7.9 kn+75%−28%−84%+160%7.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 75%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.2 kn−6%+4%−38%−28%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd1,0623,31815,3311,46810.469.310.0995%
2023not published1996231,7313145.5114.925.1894%
2021not published7102,25110,84180713.465.59.6986%
2020not published1,2093,80117,3811,42612.269.513.5070%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2024MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd10.0916.73−40%256 of 1,274Lloyd's RegisterA+C
2023not published25.1816.23+55%940 of 1,314Lloyd's RegisterA
2021not published9.6916.69−42%152 of 1,343Lloyd's RegisterA+B+C
2020not published13.5016.16−16%445 of 1,312Lloyd's RegisterA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.