Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EAGLE BARCELONA

IMO: 9795048
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 28,888 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.87 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd · part of MISC

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

121

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

10.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

30.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,964 t

CO₂ emitted

24,986 t

Distance sailed

65,886 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,182 h

258 days, 71% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 102 kg/nm · median 129 (−21%)

76.1Ranks 435 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.0Faster than 51% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+39%)

4.51Ranks 1,159 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU38%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

4,834 t

61% of all fuel; 39% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,344 t

9.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EAGLE BARCELONA
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EAGLE BARCELONA
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EAGLE BARCELONA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−14%	−12%	−70%	+52%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	+1%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+11%	+5%	+17%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−6%	−2%	+225%	+15%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+24%	+38%	+65%	−16%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 24%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−16%	−6%	+27%	+14%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	2,035	6,410	20,044	1,861	10.8	102	11.1	33%
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	7,850	24,700	66,809	6,297	10.6	118	7.29	56%
2023	not published	7,964	24,986	65,886	6,182	10.7	121	–	61%
2022	not published	6,163	19,361	56,330	5,025	11.2	109	6.19	–
2021	not published	2,021	6,352	17,344	1,612	10.8	117	5.37	–
2020	not published	985	3,158	10,500	1,084	9.7	93.8	6.36	–
2019	not published	924	2,913	8,252	952	8.7	112	5.58	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	11.1	7.95	+39%	1,159 of 1,665	ABS	C
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	7.29	8.06	−10%	736 of 1,787	ABS	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	–
2022	not published	6.19	8.51	−27%	498 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	5.37	8.86	−39%	301 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.36	9.03	−30%	426 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	5.58	8.83	−37%	342 of 1,919	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.