Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EAGLE BRASILIA

IMO: 9795062
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 46,195 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.94 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd · part of MISC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 46,195 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

123.7 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.16

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+3%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,092 t

CO₂ emitted

21,614 t

22,802 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

57,339 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,607 h

234 days, 64% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 123.7 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−4%)

76.1Ranks 744 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.0Faster than 35% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.16 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+3%)

4.51Ranks 866 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU38%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU11%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,064 t).

Fuel burned laden

47%

53% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

10.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

31.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.055

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EAGLE BRASILIA
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EAGLE BRASILIA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EAGLE BRASILIA
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+0%	−2%	−14%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−15%	−8%	+45%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	+140%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.9 kn	−15%	+42%	−21%	−21%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	−7%	−30%	−44%	−27%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+3%	+23%	+9%	+19%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	7,092	21,614	57,339	5,607	10.2	123.7	8.16	47%
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	8,291	25,229	67,050	6,432	10.4	123.7	8.65	44%
2023	not published	6,717	21,035	46,221	4,809	9.6	145.3	–	59%
2022	not published	2,737	8,605	19,228	1,970	9.8	142.3	6.89	–
2021	not published	4,077	12,396	24,468	4,177	5.9	166.6	8.67	–
2020	not published	7,900	24,048	43,984	5,655	7.8	179.6	11.87	–
2019	not published	7,084	21,518	40,506	6,226	6.5	174.9	9.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	8.16	7.95	+3%	866 of 1,665	ABS	C
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	8.65	8.06	+7%	1,001 of 1,787	ABS	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	–
2022	not published	6.89	8.51	−19%	659 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	8.67	8.86	−2%	871 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	11.87	9.03	+31%	1,236 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	9.95	8.83	+13%	1,134 of 1,919	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.