Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EAGLE BINTULU

IMO: 9795074
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 50,686 t
Flag (estimated): Malaysia
Port of registry: Labuan
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.94 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd · part of MISC

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 51,543 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

153

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.08

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (+1%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,648 t

CO₂ emitted

14,176 t

Distance sailed

30,290 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,084 h

129 days, 35% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 131 kg/nm · median 129 (+2%)

76.1Ranks 879 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.0Faster than 35% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.74 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−3%)

4.51Ranks 791 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU13%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,976 t

13.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EAGLE BINTULU
Oil tanker median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EAGLE BINTULU
Oil tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EAGLE BINTULU
Oil tanker median

6.07.08.09.010.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−2%	−8%	+20%	−7%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−2%	+6%	−3%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+26%	+18%	+63%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.2 kn	−25%	+7%	−17%	−26%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.3 kn	−6%	−29%	+23%	−4%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	+6%	+41%	−24%	+2%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	7,725	23,198	59,131	5,782	10.2	131	7.74	49%
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	6,561	20,083	49,372	4,514	10.9	133	8.33	47%
2023	not published	6,909	21,068	50,716	5,052	10.0	136	–	58%
2022	not published	3,359	10,529	31,062	2,912	10.7	108	6.45	–
2021	not published	5,368	16,383	37,390	5,003	7.5	144	8.70	–
2020	not published	4,648	14,176	30,290	3,084	9.8	153	9.08	–
2019	not published	5,780	17,368	40,095	5,397	7.4	144	8.94	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	7.74	7.95	−3%	791 of 1,665	ABS	C
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	8.33	8.06	+3%	947 of 1,787	ABS	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	–
2022	not published	6.45	8.51	−24%	561 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	8.70	8.86	−2%	877 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	9.08	9.03	+1%	942 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	8.94	8.83	+1%	983 of 1,919	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.