Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

KALOLIMNOS

IMO: 9796705
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,890 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eletson Corporation

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,890 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

74.7 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

48.20

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+36%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,129 t

CO₂ emitted

3,562 t

3,617 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,110 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,421 h

59 days, 16% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.7 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−8%)

49.8Ranks 128 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 12.6 (−16%)

8.8Faster than 21% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 48.20 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+36%)

14.36Ranks 219 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU51%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

73% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,588 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KALOLIMNOS
Gas carrier (LPG) median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KALOLIMNOS
Gas carrier (LPG) median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KALOLIMNOS
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+11%	+4%	+245%	+44%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−9%	−21%	−91%	−37%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−1%	+11%	+51%	+12%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−0.5 kn	+14%	+10%	−19%	−35%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.2 kn	−4%	+99%	−0%	+19%	6.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.3 kn	+19%	−31%	+92%	+16%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Eletson Corporation	22	70	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025	EMC GAS CORPORATION	1,129	3,562	15,110	1,421	10.6	74.7	48.20	–
2024	Eletson Corporation	296	934	4,385	387	11.3	67.6	33.49	–
2023	not published	3,710	11,664	49,854	3,806	13.1	74.4	53.49	–
2022	not published	2,488	7,814	32,996	2,844	11.6	75.4	47.90	–
2020	not published	2,688	8,434	40,795	3,376	12.1	65.9	74.12	–
2019	not published	2,797	8,733	40,808	6,961	5.9	68.5	62.29	–
2018	not published	1,224	3,820	21,293	2,092	10.2	57.5	53.75	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Eletson Corporation	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2025	EMC GAS CORPORATION	48.20	35.56	+36%	219 of 355	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Eletson Corporation	33.49	35.82	−7%	147 of 306	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	53.49	41.77	+28%	195 of 330	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	47.90	42.53	+13%	195 of 348	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	74.12	42.29	+75%	243 of 339	Lloyd's Register	–
2019	not published	62.29	45.85	+36%	201 of 331	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	53.75	53.11	+1%	152 of 297	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.