Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

HAAGA

IMO: 9797632
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Helsinki
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ESL Shipping Oy

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

64.1

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

10.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (−48%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,908 t

CO₂ emitted

8,774 t

Distance sailed

45,338 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,336 h

181 days, 49% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 62.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+77%)

17.4Ranks 2,108 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 9.3 (+9%)

6.9Faster than 66% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 10.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−59%)

10.2Ranks 294 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports73%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU27%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,334 t

26.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HAAGA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HAAGA
General cargo median

9.09.510.010.511.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

HAAGA
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−1%	−4%	+12%	−3%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	−8%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+0%	−3%	−4%	−16%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+2%	+13%	+23%	+18%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	−8%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−9%	−19%	+3%	−18%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−7%	−2%	+160%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ESL Shipping Oy	2,917	8,705	46,872	4,629	10.1	62.2	–	–
2024LNG	ESL Shipping Oy	2,630	7,741	41,871	4,025	10.4	62.8	–	–
2023	not published	2,908	8,774	45,338	4,336	10.5	64.1	–	–
2022	not published	3,012	9,216	47,077	4,359	10.8	64.0	–	–
2021	not published	2,400	7,138	38,387	3,930	9.8	62.5	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,524	7,220	41,608	4,242	9.8	60.6	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,698	7,938	40,344	3,682	11.0	66.9	–	–
2018	not published	1,120	3,474	15,514	1,503	10.3	72.2	22.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ESL Shipping Oy	10.5	25.5	−59%	294 of 2,723	DNV	C
2024LNG	ESL Shipping Oy	10.9	19.3	−44%	283 of 1,111	DNV	C
2023	not published	10.7	20.7	−48%	215 of 1,045	DNV	C
2022	not published	12.7	21.6	−41%	201 of 1,034	DNV	C
2021	not published	10.8	22.7	−53%	116 of 1,142	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10.4	24.5	−57%	100 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	12.8	25.0	−49%	143 of 1,154	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.