Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SC VIRGO

IMO: 9801093
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 30,265 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.22 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,265 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

97.9 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.27

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−32%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

922 t

CO₂ emitted

2,926 t

2,972 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,415 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

900 h

38 days, 10% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 97.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+23%)

52.8Ranks 1,136 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 32% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−32%)

7.93Ranks 362 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU28%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU15%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,864 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

15.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SC VIRGO
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SC VIRGO
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SC VIRGO
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	+17%	+1%	−52%	−20%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−2%	+1%	+24%	−1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−14%	−14%	+8%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	–	–	–	–	–
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−6%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	+163%	−25%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	922	2,926	9,415	900	10.5	97.9	10.27	–
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	1,650	5,191	19,716	1,622	12.2	83.7	12.87	–
2023	not published	1,358	4,249	15,956	1,349	11.8	85.1	13.04	–
2022	not published	1,452	4,588	14,729	1,230	12.0	98.6	16.48	–
2021	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	3,146	9,896	36,147	2,896	12.5	87.0	11.22	–
2019	not published	3,475	10,874	38,620	3,121	12.4	90.0	9.30	–
2018	not published	1,431	4,487	14,710	1,146	12.8	97.3	12.36	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	10.27	15.04	−32%	362 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	12.87	16.73	−23%	446 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	13.04	16.23	−20%	440 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.48	16.06	+3%	728 of 1,409	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	11.22	16.16	−31%	265 of 1,312	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.30	17.32	−46%	129 of 1,321	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	12.36	17.14	−28%	355 of 1,294	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.